Download IVISION Catalog
01Camera input
Capture a view suitable for plume context and flame detail.
Review smoke and flame as complementary cues
Assess each supported indication separately, then review the combined context. Do not assume both smoke and flame must be visible before a finding warrants attention.
Catalog workflow. Detector availability, scene suitability and event delivery must be verified for the proposed deployment. Camera observations supplement human review and established safety procedures.
Discuss this workflow
Example
Without IVISIONStandard CCTV feed
With IVISIONIllustrative event overlayThe Process
How It Works
Different signs can appear at different times Keep the evidence behind each indication clear.
01
02Visual criteria
Validate the smoke and flame criteria independently.
03Event review
Review which cue appeared, where and in what sequence.
04Operator response
Follow the emergency plan using all available evidence.
Explore Your Options
Explore Related Capabilities
| Dimension |  Smoke and Fire Detection |  Fire Detection |
|---|---|---|
| Observation |  Smoke-like plume, flame-like pattern or both. | Flame-like shapes and movement in the scene. |
| Event criteria | One or more validated visual criteria are met. | A validated visual fire criterion is met. |
| Monitoring setup | Confirm independent criteria, lookalikes and response routing. | Validate scene exclusions and review thresholds. |
| What it cannot establish | Absence of one cue does not rule out fire. | Hidden combustion remains unseen; cameras do not replace certified alarms. |
| Practical outcome | Give operators complementary visual context for a possible fire-related event. | Help operators locate and verify a possible visible fire indication. |
Illustrative demonstration
Review The Event.
Understand The Context.
Example footage and simulated events explain the review workflow. They do not measure detector performance.
Sites overview
Example Activity
No matching events.
EXPLORE WHAT’S POSSIBLE
What Can You Do With Smoke and Fire Detection?
01 / 04 · SMOKE AND FIRE DETECTION
Warehousing
A plume may precede visible flame.
Example event: Smoke-like imagery appears first.
Operator response: Team checks the location under the response plan.
Practical value: No need to wait for a second cue.
Discuss this capability
02 / 04 · SMOKE AND FIRE DETECTION
Manufacturing
Flame may be expected while plume changes are not.
Example event: A new plume appears near permitted work.
Operator response: Supervisor verifies the changed condition.
Practical value: Precise hot-work review.
Discuss this capability
03 / 04 · SMOKE AND FIRE DETECTION
Transport facilities
Views show different incident aspects.
Example event: Separate cameras show plume and possible flame.
Operator response: Control room reconciles location and sequence.
Practical value: Better visual coordination.
Discuss this capability
04 / 04 · SMOKE AND FIRE DETECTION
Deployment review
Assess fine detail and wider plume visibility.
Visibility: Weather and process activity affect each cue differently.
Configuration: Confirm both detectors and any event-combination behavior.
Privacy: Share incident material only with authorized personnel.
Human review: Human review and approved alarms govern response.
Discuss this capability
Frequently asked questions
Smoke and Fire Detection, Explained.
Reviews smoke-like and flame-like indications while retaining the distinction between the two cues.
Must smoke and flame both appear?
No. Either indication may warrant review.
Does combining them guarantee accuracy?
No. Each has its own lookalikes and visibility limits.
Can it confirm the cause of fire?
No. Cause determination requires investigation.
Does it replace separate sensors?
No. It supplements established detection and response systems.
Find your fit
What are you trying
to achieve?
Give operators complementary visual context for a possible fire-related event. For Emergency coordination teams, Site security operators.
Workflow to discuss
Smoke and Fire Detection + Preserve separate cue evidence.
