Download IVISION Catalog
01Control the presentation
Arrange the view so components are individually visible.
Check part quantities before the next step
A missing or extra visible part can disrupt a downstream task. A validated counting workflow can compare the observed quantity with the relevant kit specification, while staff resolve occluded items and uncertain matches.
Confirm detector support, camera suitability and the proposed event workflow before deployment.
Validate component counting
Example
Without IVISIONStandard CCTV feed
With IVISIONIllustrative event overlayThe Process
How It Works
Review the visible contents of a kit or tray Help teams check whether a visible kit contains the expected quantity.
01
02Test small-part counts
Validate local finishes, sizes and touching parts.
03Compare the kit reference
Use the correct revision and expected quantities.
04Resolve the difference
An operator checks and corrects the kit before release.
Explore Your Options
Explore Related Capabilities
| Dimension |  Component and part counting |  Missing-component detection |
|---|---|---|
| Observation |  Distinct supported parts visible in a tray, kit or work area. | Presence or apparent absence of a specified component in a defined view. |
| Event criteria | A validated count is compared with the specified quantity. | The expected visible component is not found under validated criteria. |
| Monitoring setup | Define part types, presentation and the controlled kit reference. | Specify the component, assembly variant and inspection position. |
| What it cannot establish | Counting does not establish part identity, dimensions, material or hidden contents. | Not visible does not necessarily mean absent; hidden parts and electrical function remain unverified. |
| Practical outcome | Help teams check whether a visible kit contains the expected quantity. | Help operators investigate an apparently incomplete assembly before the next step. |
Illustrative demonstration
Review The Event.
Understand The Context.
Example footage and simulated events explain the review workflow. They do not measure detector performance.
Sites overview
Example Activity
No matching events.
Related Scenarios
View More
Production MonitoringMissing-component detection
Check the presence of a particular required component.
Read More
Production MonitoringIncorrect-component detection
Review whether the visible component matches the expected type.
Read More
Production MonitoringAssembly-error detection
Inspect the assembled state after parts are used.
Read MoreEXPLORE WHAT’S POSSIBLE
What Can You Do With Component and part counting?
01 / 04 · COMPONENT AND PART COUNTING
Electronics
Small connectors may be omitted during kitting.
Example event: The visible quantity differs from the kit reference.
Operator response: Recount and verify the tray.
Practical value: Support preparation before assembly.
Discuss this capability
02 / 04 · COMPONENT AND PART COUNTING
Automotive suppliers
Similar small parts can overlap.
Example event: A supported count is available for separated fasteners.
Operator response: Check the quantity and part code separately.
Practical value: Distinguish counting from identity verification.
Discuss this capability
03 / 04 · COMPONENT AND PART COUNTING
Furniture manufacturing
A pack needs a defined number of fittings.
Example event: Visible fittings are counted before sealing.
Operator response: Confirm the packing specification and correct discrepancies.
Practical value: Reduce uncertainty at the sealing checkpoint.
Discuss this capability
04 / 04 · COMPONENT AND PART COUNTING
Deployment review
Use close, stable imaging suitable for the smallest relevant part.
Visibility: Touching, shiny or stacked components can be visually inseparable.
Configuration: Validate part classes, resolution and the reference-data connection.
Privacy: Limit capture to the kitting work surface where practical.
Human review: Operators verify the correct part revision as well as quantity.
Discuss this capability
Frequently asked questions
Component and part counting, Explained.
Count supported visible components or parts before a defined assembly or packing step.
Can it distinguish identical-looking part numbers?
Not from quantity alone; identity needs a separately validated method.
What if parts overlap?
The count may be unreliable; presentation may need adjustment.
Does it confirm dimensions?
No. Dimensional inspection requires a calibrated method.
Can expected quantities come from a bill of materials?
Only through a separately verified data integration and revision process.
Find your fit
What are you trying
to achieve?
Help teams check whether a visible kit contains the expected quantity. For Assembly supervisors, Kitting teams.
Workflow to discuss
Component and part counting + Check visible kit quantities before assembly.
