Keep visual evidence alongside the isolation procedure

Where a camera can show relevant steps, it may help review a maintenance sequence. The approved isolation, lock ownership, stored-energy release and verification steps must still be completed and documented by authorized personnel.

Catalog workflow. Detector availability, scene suitability and event delivery must be verified for the proposed deployment. Camera observations supplement human review and established safety procedures.

Discuss this workflow

Illustrative maintenance access view associated with an isolation procedure

Example

Without IVISIONStandard CCTV feed

With IVISIONIllustrative event overlay

The Process

How It Works

A lock in view is not proof of zero energy Support procedural review without certifying isolation from video.

Camera input

Show only the relevant isolation station or maintenance access point.

Visual criteria

Validate the specific visible step; do not infer hidden energy states.

Event review

Review available imagery with permits and maintenance records.

Operator response

Authorized staff resolves discrepancies using the formal isolation procedure.

Explore Your Options

Explore Related Capabilities

Dimension	Lockout/Tagout Compliance	Machine Guarding (LOTO)
Observation	A defined visible step or maintenance-area access event.	A visible guard state or person entering the guarded area.
Event criteria	The agreed observable step differs from the expected maintenance sequence.	The agreed guard/access condition differs from the expected work state.
Monitoring setup	Validate each visible criterion and its relation to the approved procedure.	Validate the specific machine view and maintenance exceptions.
What it cannot establish	Video cannot prove zero energy, lock ownership or completion of hidden steps.	Electrical, hydraulic and stored energy may remain invisible.
Practical outcome	Organize visual maintenance evidence while keeping energy-isolation verification with authorized personnel.	Help supervisors investigate an exposed guard area without mistaking a camera view for proof of safe isolation.

Explore Machine Guarding (LOTO)? Learn more

Illustrative demonstration

Review The Event.
Understand The Context.

Example footage and simulated events explain the review workflow. They do not measure detector performance.

Sites overview

Example Activity

EXPLORE WHAT’S POSSIBLE

What Can You Do With Lockout/Tagout Compliance?

01 / 04 · LOCKOUT/TAGOUT COMPLIANCE

Manufacturing

Shift handovers need clear procedure context.

Example event: A visible step is missing from the reviewed sequence.

Operator response: Lead checks the written isolation record.

Practical value: Better handover evidence.

Discuss this capability

Frequently asked questions

Lockout/Tagout Compliance, Explained.

Supports review of visible steps and access context associated with an approved lockout/tagout procedure.

Can a visible lock prove isolation?

No. The correct sources and stored energy must be verified under the procedure.

Can this replace a written LOTO record?

No. Video is supplemental evidence, not a substitute for required records.

What if a step happens off camera?

Do not treat missing imagery as proof the step was skipped.

How does this differ from machine guarding?

Guarding concerns the physical barrier; LOTO addresses hazardous-energy control during work.

Find your fit

What are you trying
to achieve?

Organize visual maintenance evidence while keeping energy-isolation verification with authorized personnel. For Authorized maintenance leads, Safety permit coordinators.

Select your priorities

Associate visual context with maintenance records. Distinguish visible steps from verified isolation. Support review of handovers and exceptions.

Workflow to discuss

Lockout/Tagout Compliance + Associate visual context with maintenance records.

Discuss This Workflow

Keep visual evidence alongside the isolation procedure