Camera input
Capture both approach paths and the interaction area.
Assess forklift and pedestrian or vehicle movement together. Review actual separation, perspective, visibility and task coordination before deciding whether the event was a near miss and what changes may help.
Catalog workflow. Detector availability, scene suitability and event delivery must be verified for the proposed deployment. Camera observations supplement human review and established safety procedures.
Discuss this workflow

The Process
A near miss is a reviewed conclusion Give investigations a concrete interaction sequence.
Capture both approach paths and the interaction area.
Validate tracking and any distance method.
Review the lead-up, closest approach and departure.
Safety staff investigates context and records a considered conclusion.
Illustrative demonstration
Example footage and simulated events explain the review workflow. They do not measure detector performance.
No matching events.
EXPLORE WHAT’S POSSIBLE
01 / 04 · FORKLIFT NEAR-MISS
Racks conceal approaching people.
Example event: A forklift and pedestrian converge.
Operator response: Supervisor reviews visibility and timing.
Practical value: Evidence for junction review.
Discuss this capability02 / 04 · FORKLIFT NEAR-MISS
Two trucks coordinate a handoff.
Example event: Their paths approach closely.
Operator response: Investigator checks planned coordination.
Practical value: Avoids automatic near-miss labels.
Discuss this capability03 / 04 · FORKLIFT NEAR-MISS
Pedestrians move near reversing trucks.
Example event: A close interaction is indicated.
Operator response: Team reviews the sequence and site controls.
Practical value: Focused operational learning.
Discuss this capability04 / 04 · FORKLIFT NEAR-MISS
Show both participants and their approach paths.
Visibility: Occlusion and perspective distort separation.
Configuration: Validate tracking, calibration and event criteria.
Privacy: Restrict investigations and avoid automatic blame or rankings.
Human review: Qualified reviewers assess exposure, context and corrective actions.
Discuss this capabilityFrequently asked questions
Identifies candidate close interactions involving forklifts for sequence-based human investigation.
No. Context and actual separation require review.
No. Responsibility needs broader investigation.
Only with an appropriate validated method.
It reveals visibility and coordination that a single frame misses.
Find your fit
Help safety teams review convergence, separation and operating context without automatically declaring a near miss. For Warehouse incident investigators, Safety supervisors.
Workflow to discuss
Forklift Near-Miss + Preserve the full interaction context.Discuss a camera view, a monitoring question and the review process your team needs.