Assess possible path conflicts

Apparent convergence in a camera view is not proof that a collision will occur. Evaluate tracking, calibration and uncertainty before considering conflict estimates, and keep established segregation and traffic controls in place.

Catalog workflow. Confirm detector availability, permitted use and event delivery for the proposed deployment. Website examples are illustrative.

Review conflict-estimation scope

Illustrative crossing trajectories, not a verified collision prediction

Example

Without IVISIONStandard CCTV feed

With IVISIONIllustrative event overlay

The Process

How It Works

Prediction requires validated geometry and timing Understand the limits of trajectory-based warnings.

Prepare the view

Assess the ground plane and full approach paths.

Assess the observation

Validate tracking and any time-to-conflict calculation.

Review the evidence

Review the proposed conflict with visibility gaps and barriers.

Choose a response

Use confirmed patterns to inform traffic management, not automatic vehicle control.

Explore Your Options

Explore Related Capabilities

Dimension	Collision-risk estimation	Vehicle-person near-miss detection
Observation	Vehicle and pedestrian paths appear to converge.	Close person/vehicle paths with a possible evasive or conflict pattern.
Event criteria	A validated model meets an agreed spatial and temporal conflict criterion.	A supported temporal analysis meets validated interaction criteria.
Monitoring setup	Confirm calibration, motion assumptions and event thresholds.	Confirm trajectory thresholds, timing and event boundaries.
What it cannot establish	Cannot guarantee prediction, warning lead time or collision prevention.	Cannot prove fault, inevitable collision or injury avoidance.
Practical outcome	Clarify which interactions deserve closer review without promising prediction.	Help safety teams examine the sequence around a narrowly avoided conflict.