Camera input
Capture the relevant face area with proportionate access controls.
Define the face covering required for the area and assess a suitable view of the lower face. Direct checks remain necessary for fit, correct use and any task-specific respiratory protection requirement.
Catalog workflow. Detector availability, scene suitability and event delivery must be verified for the proposed deployment. Camera observations supplement human review and established safety procedures.
Discuss this workflow

The Process
Presence does not establish respiratory protection Keep a simple presence check separate from health judgments.
Capture the relevant face area with proportionate access controls.
Test accepted coverings, face shields and common obstructions.
Review whether the lower face was actually visible.
Confirm the local requirement and provide a direct reminder if appropriate.
Illustrative demonstration
Example footage and simulated events explain the review workflow. They do not measure detector performance.
No matching events.
EXPLORE WHAT’S POSSIBLE
01 / 04 · MASK DETECTION
Face-covering requirements can be missed during shift changes.
Example event: A person enters without a visible covering.
Operator response: Lead checks the local hygiene rule.
Practical value: Consistent entry guidance.
Discuss this capability02 / 04 · MASK DETECTION
Different tasks require different protection.
Example event: Covering presence is uncertain.
Operator response: Supervisor checks task requirements.
Practical value: Avoids assuming respirator suitability.
Discuss this capability03 / 04 · MASK DETECTION
A covering can be mistaken for a fitted respirator.
Example event: A visible covering is flagged for review.
Operator response: Safety staff verifies required protection directly.
Practical value: Clear distinction between presence and fit.
Discuss this capability04 / 04 · MASK DETECTION
Use a clear but proportionate face-area view.
Visibility: Head turns and shields can obscure coverings.
Configuration: Validate local covering classes and required image detail.
Privacy: Treat face imagery as sensitive and limit retention/access.
Human review: Confirm fit and protection through the approved procedure.
Discuss this capabilityFrequently asked questions
Reviews whether a required face covering is visibly present in a defined area.
No. Fit and filtration are not established by appearance.
No. Mask presence must not be used to infer health status.
Only the applicable task requirement can determine acceptable protection.
Presence review need not establish identity; confirm the implementation and privacy approach.
Find your fit
Help supervisors follow up on possible face-covering omissions without inferring health or respirator protection. For Process supervisors, Site hygiene coordinators.
Workflow to discuss
Mask Detection + Review omissions against an explicit local rule.Discuss a camera view, a monitoring question and the review process your team needs.