Download IVISION Catalog
01Prepare the view
Document the relevant action and monitored area.
Define behavior that actually needs review
Choose measurable conditions such as repeated boundary approaches or out-of-hours presence. Avoid treating appearance, identity or unfamiliar behavior as evidence of wrongdoing, and require contextual review of every candidate.
Catalog workflow. Confirm detector availability, permitted use and event delivery for the proposed deployment. Website examples are illustrative.
Define observable security criteria
Example
Without IVISIONStandard CCTV feed
With IVISIONIllustrative event overlayThe Process
How It Works
An observation cannot establish intent Make security review criteria specific and accountable.
01
02Assess the observation
Validate supported criteria against ordinary legitimate behavior.
03Review the evidence
Show what was observed rather than an unexplained suspicion score.
04Choose a response
Verify the context and use proportionate authorized procedures.
Explore Your Options
Explore Related Capabilities
| Dimension |  Suspicious Behavior Detection |  Loitering Detection |
|---|---|---|
| Observation |  An agreed action, route or duration pattern. | A person stays within a monitored boundary. |
| Event criteria | A supported rule finds the specified observable condition. | Supported tracking exceeds the validated duration threshold. |
| Monitoring setup | Document criteria, exceptions and review purpose. | Confirm boundary, timing, re-entry handling and waiting exceptions. |
| What it cannot establish | Cannot infer criminal intent, trustworthiness or threat from appearance. | Cannot establish intent, unauthorized status or continuous presence during track gaps. |
| Practical outcome | Replace vague suspicion with explainable observations. | Help operators review prolonged presence in context. |
Illustrative demonstration
Review The Event.
Understand The Context.
Example footage and simulated events explain the review workflow. They do not measure detector performance.
Sites overview
Example Activity
No matching events.
Related Scenarios
View More
EXPLORE WHAT’S POSSIBLE
What Can You Do With Suspicious Behavior Detection?
01 / 04 · SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR DETECTION
Offices
Repeated approaches need explanation.
Example event: A person returns to a locked door.
Operator response: Check whether they need access assistance.
Practical value: Supports proportionate follow-up.
Discuss this capability
02 / 04 · SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR DETECTION
Warehousing
A visitor may be lost.
Example event: Repeated boundary approaches occur.
Operator response: Confirm destination and escort.
Practical value: Resolves context before escalation.
Discuss this capability
03 / 04 · SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR DETECTION
Industrial facilities
Authorized contractors work unusual hours.
Example event: Presence falls outside the usual schedule.
Operator response: Check work authorization.
Practical value: Avoids assuming wrongdoing.
Discuss this capability
04 / 04 · SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR DETECTION
Deployment review
Frame the relevant action and boundary.
Visibility: Partial views omit context.
Configuration: Verify rules instead of claiming generalized intent detection.
Privacy: Do not profile by protected or personal characteristics.
Human review: Establish facts through authorized contextual checks.
Discuss this capability
Frequently asked questions
Suspicious Behavior Detection, Explained.
A legacy label for reviewing explicitly defined activity exceptions, not determining suspicious intent.
Can the system identify criminal intent?
No. Camera appearance or movement cannot establish intent.
What should replace a suspicion score?
A clear description of the action, time and location requiring review.
Can unusual behavior be legitimate?
Yes. Assistance needs, maintenance and changed routines are common explanations.
Should appearance determine escalation?
No. Use relevant observable criteria and proportionate procedures.
Find your fit
What are you trying
to achieve?
Replace vague suspicion with explainable observations. For Security managers, Governance reviewers.
Workflow to discuss
Suspicious Behavior Detection + Use explicit observable criteria.
