Download IVISION Catalog
01Prepare the view
Define the periods and the specific change or pattern being examined.
Compare movement patterns over time
A historical map can support a before-and-after layout review or a comparison of operating periods when the underlying observations have been retained. Camera relocation, schedule changes and missing data can alter the pattern. Document these conditions before attributing a difference to an operational change.
Catalog workflow. Confirm detector availability, permitted use and event delivery for the proposed deployment. Website examples are illustrative.
Plan a historical comparison
Example
Without IVISIONStandard CCTV feed
With IVISIONIllustrative event overlayThe Process
How It Works
Keep periods, scales and coverage aligned. Make period comparisons explainable and repeatable.
01
02Assess the observation
Check data availability, camera position, operating hours and aggregation consistency.
03Review the evidence
Compare maps with shared scales and relevant contextual records.
04Choose a response
Inspect representative footage before drawing conclusions about the change.
Explore Your Options
Explore Related Capabilities
| Dimension |  Historical movement heatmaps |  High-activity and low-activity area visualization |
|---|---|---|
| Observation |  Retained movement or dwell observations produce a spatial summary for a selected interval. | A supported visual measure falls into configured intensity ranges for each area. |
| Event criteria | Select periods with available, compatible observations and a confirmed aggregation method. | Aggregate observations over a selected interval and apply a defined scale. |
| Monitoring setup | Keep units, area definitions, normalization and scales consistent; identify gaps and camera changes. | State units, duration, normalization, coverage and whether the scale is fixed or relative. |
| What it cannot establish | A historical map cannot be recreated from missing observations without a supported reprocessing service. Color changes do not establish causation. | Relative colors can exaggerate small differences. Missing observations must not be displayed as confirmed zero activity. |
| Practical outcome | Review how observed use changes over time using consistent definitions and coverage. | Make high and low observed activity comparable without hiding what the color scale represents. |
Illustrative demonstration
Review The Event.
Understand The Context.
Example footage and simulated events explain the review workflow. They do not measure detector performance.
Sites overview
Example Activity
No matching events.
Related Scenarios
View MoreTracking & MovementHigh-activity and low-activity area visualization
Choose a shared scale for meaningful comparisons.
Read More
Tracking & MovementVisitor-activity heatmaps
Apply historical comparison to visitor-facing space.
Read More
Tracking & MovementProduction-line activity maps
Include process schedules when comparing production areas.
Read MoreEXPLORE WHAT’S POSSIBLE
What Can You Do With Historical movement heatmaps?
01 / 04 · HISTORICAL MOVEMENT HEATMAPS
Retail
A display was moved between two trading weeks.
Example event: Comparable periods show a different movement distribution.
Operator response: The planner accounts for promotions and opening hours before evaluating the trial.
Practical value: The comparison separates layout questions from obvious contextual differences.
Discuss this capability
02 / 04 · HISTORICAL MOVEMENT HEATMAPS
Warehousing
A marked walkway was changed after a process review.
Example event: Retained movement observations show use of the revised route.
Operator response: Operations checks source footage and shift differences.
Practical value: The review tests actual route use within camera coverage.
Discuss this capability
03 / 04 · HISTORICAL MOVEMENT HEATMAPS
Office facilities
Use appears different across two months.
Example event: One period includes a camera outage and changed attendance patterns.
Operator response: The analyst excludes unsupported comparisons and documents the gaps.
Practical value: The report avoids treating missing observations as a trend.
Discuss this capability
04 / 04 · HISTORICAL MOVEMENT HEATMAPS
Deployment review
Keep camera geometry stable or explicitly recalibrate after changes.
Visibility: Historical observations inherit the original capture and occlusion limits.
Configuration: Require retained measurements, interval selection and a supported aggregation method.
Privacy: Set an appropriate retention period for aggregate observations and underlying footage separately.
Human review: Use contextual evidence before attributing a pattern to a particular intervention.
Discuss this capability
Frequently asked questions
Historical movement heatmaps, Explained.
Historical movement heatmaps aggregate supported observations over a selected past period to compare spatial patterns.
Can old recordings become heatmaps automatically?
Only a confirmed reprocessing and tracking service could support that. Retained footage alone does not establish map availability.
Can different camera positions be compared?
Not directly without accounting for changed coverage and geometry. Recalibration or separate interpretation may be required.
Does a changed map prove a layout improvement?
No. Schedules, attendance, promotions and other conditions may explain the difference.
How long are historical maps retained?
Retention depends on the deployment. Confirm both observation storage and source evidence retention before choosing comparison periods.
Find your fit
What are you trying
to achieve?
Review how observed use changes over time using consistent definitions and coverage. For Facilities analysts, Retail planners, Operations improvement teams.
Workflow to discuss
Historical movement heatmaps + Compare defined periods with consistent spatial measures.
